From pycyn@aol.com Sat Oct 05 14:24:09 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 5 Oct 2002 21:24:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 92449 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2002 21:24:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Oct 2002 21:24:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d02.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.34)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2002 21:24:09 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.13.12cd35b7 (4230)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:24:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <13.12cd35b7.2ad0b275@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:24:05 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] prescription & description (was: RE: Re: a new kind of fundament...
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_13.12cd35b7.2ad0b275_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_13.12cd35b7.2ad0b275_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

My position continues to be that unless you can consistently produce 
sentences that pass the parser and -- on the basis of the parse -- say pretty 
much what you intended them to, you have no right to be deviant other than 
the inalienable right to screw up. Once you are a mature Lojban 
speaker/writer and no longer a child learning the language, then, hey, knock 
your lights out! Be James Joyce in one of his merrier moments, play with 
Lojban as you do with your native tongue(s). And expect people to heed what 
you do. Before then, however, the correct response to deviance is "Sorry, 
Junior, you do not yet have that quite right." And your response to that is 
not to start making a case that it is too right (face screwed up -- a 
different sense, heels dug in and all), but to say "Oh, please tell me how to 
do it correctly." Directed to those who can (who have not only to do but to 
teach as well).

--part1_13.12cd35b7.2ad0b275_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>My position continues to be that unless you can consistently produce sentences that pass the parser and -- on the basis of the parse -- say pretty much what you intended them to, you have no right to be deviant other than the inalienable right to screw up.&nbsp; Once you are a mature Lojban speaker/writer and no longer a child learning the language, then, hey, knock your lights out!&nbsp;&nbsp; Be James Joyce in one of his merrier moments, play with Lojban as you do with your native tongue(s).&nbsp; And expect people to heed what you do.&nbsp; Before then, however, the correct response to deviance is "Sorry, Junior, you do not yet have that quite right." And your response to that is not to start making a case that it is too right (face screwed up -- a different sense, heels dug in and all), but to say "Oh, please tell me how to do it correctly."&nbsp; Directed to those who can (who have not only to do but to teach as well).</FONT></HTML>

--part1_13.12cd35b7.2ad0b275_boundary--

