From pycyn@aol.com Sun Oct 06 16:51:12 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 6 Oct 2002 23:51:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 59652 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2002 23:51:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Oct 2002 23:51:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r08.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.104)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Oct 2002 23:51:12 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.7a.2df81e83 (3956)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 6 Oct 2002 19:51:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <7a.2df81e83.2ad2266b@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 19:51:07 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_7a.2df81e83.2ad2266b_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10509
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_7a.2df81e83.2ad2266b_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 10/6/2002 10:47:07 AM Central Daylight Time, 
a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:
quoting Jordan:
<<
> *Some* cmavo, primarily the ones in UI which just freely modify
> > things could be easily reorganized as a brivla, and in practice are
> > in fact stated that way frequently. (You see gleki leza'i do broda
> > as much as .ui do broda). 
>>

This is the oldest screw-up in Lojban (and Loglan before it). People who 
can't tell UI from "I am ... that..." bridi are suffering from the original 
malglico and clearly have not yet earned the right to play with the language. 
They just need to be gently asked which they really mean (Do you care how I 
feel or do you care that ...?) and reminded how to say the one they want. 
This is a clear case of the parse (often) not giving the intended meaning. 
And all the bad usage in the world will not change that.

--part1_7a.2df81e83.2ad2266b_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>In a message dated 10/6/2002 10:47:07 AM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:<BR>
quoting Jordan:<BR>
&lt;&lt;<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">*Some* cmavo, primarily the ones in UI which just freely modify<BR>
&gt; things could be easily reorganized as a brivla, and in practice are<BR>
&gt; in fact stated that way frequently.&nbsp; (You see gleki leza'i do broda<BR>
&gt; as much as .ui do broda).&nbsp; </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
&gt;&gt;<BR>
<BR>
This is the oldest screw-up in Lojban (and Loglan before it).&nbsp; People who can't tell UI from "I am ... that..." bridi are suffering from the original malglico and clearly have not yet earned the right to play with the language.&nbsp; They just need to be gently asked which they really mean (Do you care how I feel or do you care that ...?) and reminded how to say the one they want.&nbsp; This is a clear case of the parse (often) not giving the intended meaning.&nbsp; And all the bad usage in the world will not change that.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_7a.2df81e83.2ad2266b_boundary--

