From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Oct 07 18:05:09 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 8 Oct 2002 01:05:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 22580 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 01:05:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Oct 2002 01:05:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 01:05:08 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17yiro-0003N1-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:08:56 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17yir6-0003Mi-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:08:12 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17yir2-0003MZ-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 18:08:08 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g981C2GZ040097
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:12:02 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g981C2O5040096
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:12:02 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:12:02 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism
Message-ID: <20021008011202.GA39636@allusion.net>
References: <171.1517cb9e.2ad302f1@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <171.1517cb9e.2ad302f1@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 1978
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:32:01AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/6/2002 7:07:18 PM Central Daylight Time,=20
> lojban-out@lojban.org writes, quoting pc quoting him:
> <<
> > > This is the oldest screw-up in Lojban (and Loglan before it). People=
who=20
> > > can't tell UI from "I am ... that..." bridi are suffering from the=20
> > original=20
> > > malglico and clearly have not yet earned the right to play with the=20
> > language.=20
> > > They just need to be gently asked which they really mean (Do you car=
e=20
> > how I=20
> > > feel or do you care that ...?) and reminded how to say the one they w=
ant.=20
> >=20=20
> > > This is a clear case of the parse (often) not giving the intended=20
> > meaning.=20=20
> > > And all the bad usage in the world will not change that.
> >=20
> > Ok, I read the above paragraph about 4 times, and I can't make heads
> > or tails of it. Clearly it is intended to be insulting, but you
> > wrote it so poorly I have no idea what you're even complaining
> > about, which just makes it look asinine. However, I'll give you
> > the benefit of the doubt and assume you actually *are* talking about
> > *something*, however incoherently.
> >=20
> > Would you like to try again?
> >>
[zu'o kasta'a]
> The rest is just the standard policy for dealing with the error. Ascerta=
in=20
> that it was an error, that the user really meant to say the other thing, =
and=20
> then gently (two-by- fours are OK after a few recurrences, but dynamite i=
s=20
> never appropriate) remind the misuser of the distinction and how to make =
it.

Ok; I agree that there is a gramatical difference, but not that
there is a real semantic difference (except perhaps in which part
of the claim is more important (the fact you are happy, or whatever
the other claim is))...

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9ojDiDrrilS51AZ8RAhjsAKCKlyLW7IIlJhHiJbvGwXBXgdpkIgCeNlqw
mgK1mXgg/vnvFvq4U+YAZ1k=
=CM5r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--

