From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 08 13:37:22 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 8 Oct 2002 20:37:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 98644 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 20:37:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Oct 2002 20:37:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 20:37:22 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z1AJ-0004KC-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:41:15 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z19f-0004Hd-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:40:35 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z19a-0004H7-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:40:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD98012B9D
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:36:34 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (ppp134.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.111.134])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B54112B9A
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:36:31 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <3DA34314.1080905@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:41:56 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism
References: <171.1517cb9e.2ad302f1@aol.com> <20021008011202.GA39636@allusion.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300
X-archive-position: 1989
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Turner <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
From: Robin Turner <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:32:01AM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> 
>>In a message dated 10/6/2002 7:07:18 PM Central Daylight Time, 
>>lojban-out@lojban.org writes, quoting pc quoting him:
>><<
>>
>>>>This is the oldest screw-up in Lojban (and Loglan before it). People who 
>>>>can't tell UI from "I am ... that..." bridi are suffering from the 
>>>>
>>>original 
>>>
>>>>malglico and clearly have not yet earned the right to play with the 
>>>>
>>>language. 
>>>
>>>> They just need to be gently asked which they really mean (Do you care 
>>>>
>>>how I 
>>>
>>>>feel or do you care that ...?) and reminded how to say the one they want. 
>>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>>This is a clear case of the parse (often) not giving the intended 
>>>>
>>>meaning. 
>>>
>>>>And all the bad usage in the world will not change that.
>>>>
>>>Ok, I read the above paragraph about 4 times, and I can't make heads
>>>or tails of it. Clearly it is intended to be insulting, but you
>>>wrote it so poorly I have no idea what you're even complaining
>>>about, which just makes it look asinine. However, I'll give you
>>>the benefit of the doubt and assume you actually *are* talking about
>>>*something*, however incoherently.
>>>
>>>Would you like to try again?
>>>
> [zu'o kasta'a]
> 
>>The rest is just the standard policy for dealing with the error. Ascertain 
>>that it was an error, that the user really meant to say the other thing, and 
>>then gently (two-by- fours are OK after a few recurrences, but dynamite is 
>>never appropriate) remind the misuser of the distinction and how to make it.
>>
> 
> Ok; I agree that there is a gramatical difference, but not that
> there is a real semantic difference (except perhaps in which part
> of the claim is more important (the fact you are happy, or whatever
> the other claim is))...
> 
> 

I think it's more than a grammatical difference (in the narrow sense of 
the word). If I say "mi gleki", I am making a proposition; i.e. a 
statement about the world which has a truth value, just as it would if I 
were to say "le mi speni cu gleki". If I say ".ui" I am expressing a 
feeling of happiness; it has no more truth value than smiling (hence 
that interminable thread about ironic attitudinals some time back).

robin.tr

-- 
"We do not imprison ourselves with laws, or impoverish ourselves with 
money" - Iain Banks

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Universitesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin





