From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 08 13:49:59 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 8 Oct 2002 20:49:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 21146 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 20:48:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Oct 2002 20:48:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 20:48:24 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z1Kz-00050J-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:52:17 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z1KN-0004xX-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:51:39 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z1KJ-0004x5-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:51:35 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5632012B9D
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:47:40 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (ppp134.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.111.134])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D504F12AAC
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:47:36 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <3DA345AE.5060103@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:53:02 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Why linguists might be interested in Lojban (was: RE: Re: a new kind of fundamentalism
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKEIAGKAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300
X-archive-position: 1990
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Turner <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
From: Robin Turner <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

And Rosta wrote:
> Lojbab:
> 
>>At 04:46 PM 10/6/02 +0100, And wrote:
>>
>>>Lojbab:
>>>
>>>>At 05:32 PM 10/5/02 +0100, And Rosta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Lojbab:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Finally and most importantly for one key Lojbanic purpose,
>>>>>>
>>>>>Remind us what purpose it is, and why it is important?
>>>>>
>>>>Use of Lojban for linguistic research (which requires that Lojban have
>>>>enough properties of a natural language that any research findings are
>>>>deemed "interesting" to linguists)
>>>>
>>>But why is it important,
>>>
>>We're getting circular. Because it is a key Lojbanic purpose, the main
>>reason why the Loglan Project was started.
>>
> 
> Not quite circular:
> 
> You: Lojban needs to go the Naturalist route in order to be interesting
> to linguists.
> Me: (A) Why does it need to be interesting to linguists? (B) It is more
> likely to interest linguists if it goes the Engineerist route.
> 
> If I remember rightly, the key purpose in question was to have a
> language that was 'whorfianly neutral', so that usage could then be
> examined to see if there were any whorfian interferences from the L1.
> (Correct me if I'm wrong -- you're clearer on this than me.) But
> the Naturalist route wants to complete the creation process through
> usage, in which case there is inevitably going to be massive L1
> interference, but not of an interesting sort, because it won't
> be counterposed to any defined whorfianly neutral grammar.

.iesai From a linguistic point of view, it is exactly this potential 
tension between grammar and usage which would be interesting. to 
illustrate the point in a rather absurd way, I once ran a 
cyberpunk-style role-playing game in which Lojban was a lingua franca 
for geeks. The two Lojbanisms that really caught on amongst the players 
were "mabla" (correct usage) and "le do mamta cu gerku" (incorrect, in 
canonical Lojban).

robin.tr




-- 
"We do not imprison ourselves with laws, or impoverish ourselves with 
money" - Iain Banks

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Universitesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin





