From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 08 18:40:29 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 9 Oct 2002 01:40:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 92676 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 01:40:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Oct 2002 01:40:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 01:40:28 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z5te-00048w-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:44:22 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z5sq-00048d-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:43:32 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z5sb-00048U-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:43:17 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g991lAGZ047985
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:47:15 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g991l9rd047984
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:47:09 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:47:09 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: a new kind of fundamentalism
Message-ID: <20021009014709.GA47905@allusion.net>
References: <102.1c11da15.2ad49195@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <102.1c11da15.2ad49195@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2014
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:52:53PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/8/2002 10:11:55 AM Central Daylight Time,=20
> lojban-out@lojban.org writes:
[...]
> > It wouldn't be false if the event didn't occur because it uses "le".
> > I agree that the "pure emotion indicators" don't affect truth value...
> I'm not sure what {le} has to do with it -- I take it that that is balanc=
ed=20
> by "the event" in English: whatever it is that {le nu [bridi]} refers to=
, if=20

le makes it a description... if it said "lo nu" it would claim that some
such events exist, and that zo'e is happy about them...

> that did not occur, some people would say taht was enough to make the who=
le=20
> flse. Others would disagree and still otheres would say "It depends on=20
> context" (a totally normal Lojban situation, in short).
> If the fact that they have different truth values in the same situation i=
s=20
> not evidence for a semantic difference, what will count?! Such a differe=
nce=20

I mean that they *mean* the same things. "Semantic difference" as
you're thinking of it, sure. But "gleki leza'i broda" and ".ui
broda" *mean* the same thing in a real conversation (or at least
they would most of the time).

Anyway this has all strayed quite far from the all-cmavo-can-be-
transormed-into-brivla claim of And's that it was all originally about.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9o4qdDrrilS51AZ8RAncCAKCCAHd/dvsHS/uNtMF8tdjYjnBpwwCgt0hQ
J9HI2UTV+7CuFTQK6I4AWP0=
=W9Et
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--

