From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 08 19:03:12 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 9 Oct 2002 02:03:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 27415 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 02:03:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Oct 2002 02:03:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 02:03:11 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z6Fd-0004MY-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:07:05 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z6Es-0004MA-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:06:18 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 17z6Eh-0004M0-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:06:07 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g992A6GZ048493
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:10:06 -0500 (CDT)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g992A6I0048492
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:10:06 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 21:10:06 -0500
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Again with the Alice.
Message-ID: <20021009021006.GA48376@allusion.net>
References: <20021008200946.GS4649@digitalkingdom.org> <003801c26fdf$1885b080$af86003e@default> <20021008220916.GV4649@digitalkingdom.org> <004d01c26fe7$70f30b20$af86003e@default> <20021008231452.GZ4649@digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021008231452.GZ4649@digitalkingdom.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2015
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:14:52PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:58:17AM +0200, Adam Raizen wrote:
> > > > Btw, I assume it would not be a problem to click on edit for a
> > > > page, disconnect from the internet, translate some, and then
> > > > reconnect and submit it (some of us have dialup accounts, and have
> > > > to pay for local calls).
> > >
> > > And that is *exactly* why I split it into paragraphs:
> > >
> > > While you are gone the page is locked. People can break the lock,
> > > but then things get messy. I didn't want whole chapters to be
> > > locked at once long term.
> > >
> > > It expires after one hour, but still. And this way I can increase
> > > that time limit.
> >=20
> > That might solve your locking problem, but it exacerbates the dialup
> > problem. With the way it is now, I would have to dialup my ISP,
> > retrieve the paragraph, disconnect, translate it, dialup again, submit
> > and get the next paragraph, disconnect, etc. It strongly discourages
> > doing much more than a paragraph at a time.
>=20
> OK.
>=20
> So, we have what appears to be an insurmountable conflict:
>=20
> I am not OK with having an entire chapter of Alice locked while you are
> doing your offline editing.
>=20
> You are not OK with dealing with it being broken up into paragraphs
> (what's stopping you from editing more than one paragraph at a time,
> anyways?).
>=20
> I see no obvious solution. Do you have one?

How about making the RCS database public for people who prefer to
edit offline/not in a webbrowser/etc?

For extra credit you could forward port the twiki code to use CVS
instead.

Dunno...=20

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9o4/+DrrilS51AZ8RAkxjAJ9VNFefqAsa9BDt6w6ZnGu9kbeXPgCcCLyQ
ydcPZ4FmOzW8s5QRucInDww=
=NVk0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--

