From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Oct 10 19:58:19 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 11 Oct 2002 02:58:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 27216 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2002 02:57:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Oct 2002 02:57:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2002 02:57:39 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17zq3f-0004DC-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:01:47 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17zq37-0004Cv-00; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:01:14 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17zq33-0004Cm-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 20:01:09 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9B356GZ070905 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:05:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g9B356pm070904 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:05:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:05:05 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Again with the Alice. Message-ID: <20021011030505.GB70303@allusion.net> References: <20021008200946.GS4649@digitalkingdom.org> <003801c26fdf$1885b080$af86003e@default> <20021008220916.GV4649@digitalkingdom.org> <004d01c26fe7$70f30b20$af86003e@default> <20021008231452.GZ4649@digitalkingdom.org> <20021009021006.GA48376@allusion.net> <20021009171819.GF4649@digitalkingdom.org> <20021010024906.GA58996@allusion.net> <20021010180359.GA1332@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021010180359.GA1332@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 2146 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:03:59AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:49:06PM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote: [...] > > This has nothing to do with the locking problem. It sidesteps it. If > > araizen (or whoever wants to do offline or more convient editing) does > > a cvs up (or whatever it is with RCS), they can edit at their leisure > > and then commit later.=20=20 >=20 > You seem to be confusing RCS with cvs. CVS is based on RCS, so I was assuming RCS was network-wise also. > Or perhaps I do not understand what you mean by 'making the RCS database > public'. Apparently RCS co(1), ci(1) etc doesn't work over a network (unless the filesystem itself is network-backed), so it can't really work. But it could still be made to use CVS. Dunno; doesn't matter that much though. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9pj/hDrrilS51AZ8RAptxAJoDEteGG4H27Rm8XLijj5V3GOji8QCgnR9f aU6MuduN1R4f/IeytvvtmUs= =LvRs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx--