From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Fri Oct 11 16:14:22 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 11 Oct 2002 23:14:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 518 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2002 23:12:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Oct 2002 23:12:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 2002 23:12:31 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18091R-0003UC-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:16:45 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18090l-0003Ta-00; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:16:03 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailbox-5.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.105])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18090h-0003TC-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 16:15:59 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-66-46.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.66.46])
  by mailbox-5.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A970F17181
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 01:11:06 +0200 (DST)
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Usage deciding (was: RE: Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:12:47 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEOPGKAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20021011023840.GA70303@allusion.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-archive-position: 2161
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

Jordan:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:50:56AM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> > Lojbab:
> > > You and And seem to be the primary innovators who KNOW that you are 
> > > acting against the baseline.
> > 
> > That's probably true, but I don't think much of my activity is contrary
> > to the baseline. There is universal agreement that CLL is wrong in places
> > (or near-universal agreement, I had better say, now that Jordan has
> > joined the community), so either mere deviance from CLL is not necessarily
> > acting against the baseline, or else there is universal agreement to
> > act against the baseline.
> [...]
> 
> For the record this doesn't reflect my viewpoint. 

Which bit doesn't?

> For example, CLL
> is probably wrong about vo'a, as the ma'oste is also baselined and
> had a different meaning. Also, either the ma'oste or CLL is wrong
> about the exact definition of "tamsmi" (they have x2 and x3 flipped).
> 
> However, these sorts of minor things which need clarification don't
> justify breaking the things which do work. (for example, xorxes' ji'i
> thing).

xorxes's ji'i is a relative extreme case of deviance. (If I were xorxes
I'd use experimental cmavo instead of deviantly reusing cmavo I thought
broken.)

--And.




