Subject: [lojban] Re: x1 is of type x2

From: Jordan DeLong <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:51:24 -0500

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:46:40AM -0500, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:56:06PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
[...]
> Also I think the original makes a stronger claim than "na bilga" (== it
> is false that should), so perhaps you should consider using a scalar
> negator. Something like
> to'e bilga co tavla fi le'e tai co'e va'o loi sivni
> bilga co to'e tavla fi le'e tai co'e va'o loi sivni
> .einai tavla fi le'e tai co'e va'o loi sivni
> .e'i to'e tavla fi le'e tai co'e va'o loi sivni
> (or other such thing)

Or you could even just put it in the selbri tag place (for any of the
above variants, (and others)):
to'e bilga co tai tavla va'o loi sivni

Which is probably a lot better than "fi le'e tai co'e".

-- 
Jordan DeLong - [email-masked]
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku