From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 15 17:04:17 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 16 Oct 2002 00:04:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 65590 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 00:04:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Oct 2002 00:04:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Oct 2002 00:04:16 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 181bk9-0007vf-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:08:57 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 181bjS-0007vJ-00; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:08:14 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 181bjN-0007vA-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:08:10 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9G0C0GZ018853 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:12:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g9G0C0dT018852 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:12:00 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:12:00 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: brivla for 'intend' Message-ID: <20021016001200.GC18227@allusion.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 2200 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 08:35:16PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la and cusku di'e > >What is the best brivla for "x intends that p, x intends to p", given th= at > >intention does not entail action (or deliberate inaction) and that, ba'e= =20 > >ti'e, > >intention is a psychological primitive (i.e. doesn't reduce to a complex= of > >other notions)? >=20 > I tend to use {zukte fi} for lack of a better option, but it is certainly= a=20 > gap > in the vocabulary. I've been using djica for this. I think english stuff like "I intended/meant to do that, but ...", is just mi pu djica ... zukte fi is probably good too for some usages of "intend". --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9rK7QDrrilS51AZ8RAu2uAJ464FIZEypIB7sTpcFkcKZXT4tXCwCbBMa7 tf2/Vvto7u2nWW28MlOX97c= =lBNI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TiqCXmo5T1hvSQQg--