Subject: jvoste

From: And Rosta <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:53:37 +0100

Are the lujvo in NORALUJV.txt drawn from usage, or were they thought up by the compiler of the list?
Are the lujvo in NORALUJV.tx well-formed by the standard criteria of appositeness and seljvajvohood?
What processes are in place for sifting usage for new lujvo? Should we eachbe making the effort to document our lujvo usage?

Is anyone studying rafsi preferences? The lujvo in the jvoste are listed in 
their shortest possible form, but I dimly recall Nick (or someone) researching 
the issue several years ago and finding that CXXCy rafsi were preferred to
CVCy and CV'V(r).

--And.