From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Thu Oct 24 09:26:56 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 24 Oct 2002 16:26:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 84995 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 16:26:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Oct 2002 16:26:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 16:26:55 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 184kuQ-0000D8-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:32:34 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 184kts-0000Co-00; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:32:00 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailbox-15.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.115])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 184kto-0000Cd-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:31:56 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-68-7.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.68.7])
  by mailbox-15.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6610D206B2
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:25:42 +0200 (DST)
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: la ogYsty 
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:27:22 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGEBPGMAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20021024160434.GA44150@allusion.net>
X-archive-position: 2309
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

Jordan:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:45:51PM +0100, And Rosta wrote:
> > I am having difficulty in working out how {la .ogYsty.} can misparse
> > in such a way as to make it illicit. I can't find any way of
> > breaking it down into smaller chunks 
> > 
> > Other examples:
> > 
> > la .olbyni 
> > la cropcy 
> > la kadiu 
> > la to,ori 
> 
> None of those end in a consonant 
> 
> > The same question goes for {la stylanan.} and {la stailanan} 
> 
> You can't have "la", "lai", or "doi" in a cmene 

I meant to ask: "Are they malformed cmene for any other reason than
that they violate these two rules?" For example, {la sami} is
{la sa mi}, so even if names were allowed to end in vowels, {sami}
would still be excluded. Is there a reason why the cmevla rules
had to be formulated so as to exclude the above exx?

--And.