From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Oct 28 12:13:25 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 28 Oct 2002 20:13:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 59671 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2002 20:13:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Oct 2002 20:13:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Oct 2002 20:13:25 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 186GGK-0002Bh-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:24 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 186GGD-0002BP-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:17 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 186GG8-0002BE-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:12 -0800
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:12 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: <grumble> jmina vs. vimcu
Message-ID: <20021028201312.GG6599@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <F193Q8n0lfEmBpWD5r400002f61@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F193Q8n0lfEmBpWD5r400002f61@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2344
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:42:47PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> 
> la camgusmis cusku di'e
> 
> >Why is the x2 of jmina the thing added to, but the x3 of vimcu is the
> >thing subtracted from?
> 
> The first definition of jmina is "x1 adds x2 to x2", so x2 is the
> thing added, not added to.

Oh.

'k.

Thanks.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ http://www.lojban.org/
la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a
darlu le'o -- RLP I'm a *male* Robin.




