From phma@webjockey.net Mon Oct 28 20:19:30 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 29 Oct 2002 04:19:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 66082 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2002 04:19:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Oct 2002 04:19:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2002 04:19:30 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 186Nqe-00056y-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:19:24 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 186NqV-00056g-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:19:16 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:19:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 186NqQ-00056X-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:19:10 -0800
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id A912F3C6A9; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:18:35 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Non-logical (incidental) "if"?
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:18:30 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <200210282232.RAA20836@mail2.reutershealth.com> <3DBDCBC3.8060401@bilkent.edu.tr>
In-Reply-To: <3DBDCBC3.8060401@bilkent.edu.tr>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <02102823183007.03221@neofelis>
X-archive-position: 2360
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Monday 28 October 2002 18:44, Robin Turner wrote:
> That's logically correct, but not very, er, Gricean. This calls for an
> attitudinal, not a logical connector, I think.

How about a preposition?
mi klama le zarci seti'i lenu do kansa
mi klama le zarci fau da'i lenu do kansa

mu'omi'e pier.