From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 29 06:12:48 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 29 Oct 2002 14:12:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 34520 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2002 05:46:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Oct 2002 05:46:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2002 05:46:12 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 186PCe-0005hy-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:46:12 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 186PCU-0005hf-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:46:02 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 186PCP-0005hW-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:45:57 -0800
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:45:57 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: <more grumbling> cfari vs. fanmo
Message-ID: <20021029054557.GV6599@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20021028201407.GH6599@digitalkingdom.org> <20021028214857.GA72708@allusion.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021028214857.GA72708@allusion.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2363
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:48:58PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > Why does cfari not have the incredibly useful second place that fanmo
> > does?
> 
> cfari and fanmo aren't parallel in concept. cfari and mulno are.
> 
> I think krasi is the on which is parallel to fanmo.

OK; how about a parallel to sisti, i.e. agentive initiation?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ http://www.lojban.org/
la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a
darlu le'o -- RLP I'm a *male* Robin.




