From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Oct 29 07:06:20 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_1); 29 Oct 2002 15:06:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 71580 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2002 05:57:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Oct 2002 05:57:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2002 05:57:53 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 186PNx-0005mw-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:57:53 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 186PNl-0005mf-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:57:41 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:57:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 186PNh-0005mW-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:57:37 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9T6399B077963 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:03:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g9T639sb077962 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:03:09 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:03:09 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: cfari vs. fanmo Message-ID: <20021029060309.GA77834@allusion.net> References: <20021028201407.GH6599@digitalkingdom.org> <20021028214857.GA72708@allusion.net> <20021029054557.GV6599@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021029054557.GV6599@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 2364 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 09:45:57PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:48:58PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:14:07PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Why does cfari not have the incredibly useful second place that fanmo > > > does? > >=20 > > cfari and fanmo aren't parallel in concept. cfari and mulno are. > >=20 > > I think krasi is the on which is parallel to fanmo. >=20 > OK; how about a parallel to sisti, i.e. agentive initiation? cfagau --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9viScDrrilS51AZ8RAqbJAKDAzLsS5DA9XCbSXc+6xHvOcagngACgkY+K WT5tbmcoeO/nM1yn1im4laI= =Nz3Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--