From pycyn@aol.com Wed Nov 06 10:49:34 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 6 Nov 2002 18:49:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 33153 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 18:49:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Nov 2002 18:49:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r09.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.105) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 18:49:32 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.1a7.b7d49e8 (17377) for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:49:21 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1a7.b7d49e8.2afabe31@aol.com> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:49:21 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: What the heck is this crap? To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1a7.b7d49e8.2afabe31_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 230 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_1a7.b7d49e8.2afabe31_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/6/2002 11:34:23 AM Central Standard Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes: << > At the very least, could the High And Mighty Masters write this stuff > down somewhere? >> It is all in the archives. However, any attempt to publish the results -- or even the range of opinions -- merely sets off another round running through all the same crap again, rather than be taken as definitive. Were there any probability that publishing (yet again, in most cases) the results of these discussions would stop the pointless nattering and dilettante whining, we could do it pretty rapidly. As it is (or, at least, has always been), no one is inclined to waste the time to wite it up once more. --part1_1a7.b7d49e8.2afabe31_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/6/2002 11:34:23 AM Central Standard Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:
<<

At the very least, could the High And Mighty Masters write this stuff
down somewhere?

>>
It is all in the archives. However, any attempt to publish the results -- or even the range of opinions -- merely sets off another round running through all the same crap again, rather than be taken as definitive. Were there any probability that publishing (yet again, in most cases) the results of these discussions would stop the pointless nattering and dilettante whining, we could do it pretty rapidly. As it is (or, at least, has always been), no one is inclined to waste the time to wite it up once more.

--part1_1a7.b7d49e8.2afabe31_boundary--