From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Nov 07 11:46:05 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 74334 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.33) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2002 19:46:05 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:46:05 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:46:04 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: importing ro Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:46:04 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2002 19:46:05.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F3428F0:01C28696] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la camgusmis cusku di'e > > ro broda cu brode > > = ro da poi broda cu brode > > = ro da ga na broda gi brode > >It would help me if someone would describe the other alternative in the >format above. The other alternative (favoured by pc) is: ro broda cu brode = ge de broda gi ro da ga na broda gi brode You can see that both alternatives agree when some broda exists, but give opposite truth values when there are no broda. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail