From pycyn@aol.com Thu Nov 07 18:19:18 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 2409 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r09.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.105) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:17 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.cb.2add9654 (26116) for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:14 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: importing ro To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 230 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/7/2002 5:26:51 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes: << > That's why I listed (2) as something we can agree on. Or at least we > can agree on it enough that the issue of import dies as a bone of > contention. >> But it appears that we do not agree on even this (nor on what happens in an empty universe). So this particular effort to circumvent or change the basic Logic/Lojban frame fares no better than the others. Mayhap we don't want to be "compromised" out of an established position. --part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/7/2002 5:26:51 PM Central Standard Time, a.rosta@lycos.co.uk writes:
<<
That's why I listed (2) as something we can agree on. Or at least we
can agree on it enough that the issue of import dies as a bone of
contention.

>>
But it appears that we do not agree on even this (nor on what happens in an empty universe).  So this particular effort to circumvent or change the basic Logic/Lojban frame fares no better than the others.  Mayhap we don't want to be "compromised" out of an established position.
 --part1_cb.2add9654.2afc7922_boundary--