From pycyn@aol.com Thu Nov 07 18:19:30 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 2768 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m07.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.162) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:29 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.160.16a7da01 (26116) for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:19 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <160.16a7da01.2afc7927@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:19 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: importing ro To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_160.16a7da01.2afc7927_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 230 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_160.16a7da01.2afc7927_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/7/2002 6:35:09 PM Central Standard Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes: << > In Ch16: > > 6.6) re prenu viska mi > Two persons see me. > is short for > 6.7) re da poi prenu cu viska mi > Two Xes which are-persons see me. > which in turn is short for: > 6.8) re da poi prenu zo'u da viska mi > For-two Xes which are-persons : X sees me. > > Since ro is in PA, this obviously applies. I don't see that there's > anything > to argue about. >> I'm convinced -- the easier since, of the two possibilities, this is the one I favored. --part1_160.16a7da01.2afc7927_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/7/2002 6:35:09 PM Central Standard Time, lojban-out@lojban.org writes:
<<
In Ch16:

6.6)  re prenu viska mi
  Two persons see me.
is short for
6.7)  re da poi prenu cu viska mi
  Two Xes which are-persons see me.
which in turn is short for:
6.8)  re da poi prenu zo'u da viska mi
  For-two Xes which are-persons : X sees me.

Since ro is in PA, this obviously applies.  I don't see that there's anything
to argue about.

>>
I'm convinced -- the easier since, of the two possibilities, this is the one I favored.
 --part1_160.16a7da01.2afc7927_boundary--