From pycyn@aol.com Thu Nov 07 18:19:38 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 2999 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 02:19:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m05.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.8)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 02:19:38 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id r.32.2fe50044 (26116)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <32.2fe50044.2afc7926@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 21:19:18 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: importing ro
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_32.2fe50044.2afc7926_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 230
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_32.2fe50044.2afc7926_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 11/7/2002 6:13:54 PM Central Standard Time, 
xod@thestonecutters.net writes:
<<
> Are you sure that refusal to accept that equation is a
> legitimate possibility?
>>
Of course it is and, when that is combine with equating the second with {ro 
da ganai broda gi brode}, is obligatory.

--part1_32.2fe50044.2afc7926_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 11/7/2002 6:13:54 PM Central Standard Time, xod@thestonecutters.net writes:<BR>
&lt;&lt;<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Are you sure that refusal to accept that equation is a<BR>
legitimate possibility?</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
&gt;&gt;<BR>
Of course it is and, when that is combine with equating the second with {ro da ganai broda gi brode}, is obligatory.<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_32.2fe50044.2afc7926_boundary--

