From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu Nov 07 19:51:20 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Nov 2002 03:51:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 53460 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 03:51:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Nov 2002 03:51:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 03:51:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18A0Ay-000596-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:51:20 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18A0Av-00058p-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:51:17 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:51:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18A0Ar-00058g-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 19:51:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA83pCG92732 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:51:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:51:12 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: importing ro In-Reply-To: <32.2fe50044.2afc7926@aol.com> Message-ID: <20021107224942.A91971-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2528 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 11/7/2002 6:13:54 PM Central Standard Time, > xod@thestonecutters.net writes: > << > > Are you sure that refusal to accept that equation is a > > legitimate possibility? > >> > Of course it is and, when that is combine with equating the second with {ro > da ganai broda gi brode}, is obligatory. You mean to tell me that Lojban, as told by the CLL, can permit that {ro broda != ro da poi broda}? -- "In the Soviet Union, government controls industry. In the United States, industry controls government. That is the principal structural difference between the two great oligarchies of our time." -- Edward Abbey