From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu Nov 14 05:31:52 2002
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: Lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Nov 2002 13:31:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 27724 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 13:31:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2002 13:31:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 13:31:50 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:57:23 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:31:09 +0000
Message-Id: <sdd3a59d.006@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:30:34 +0000
To: Lojban <Lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Wiki summary of consensus about {ro}
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

The big debate about "importing ro" moved from this list to Jboske, where i=
s was eventually resolved. The consensus is given on the wiki (in a text th=
at the debate's participants approved):

http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/quantification%20and%20the%20meaning%2=
0of%20ro


--And.