From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Nov 14 11:18:55 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Nov 2002 19:18:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 73050 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 19:18:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2002 19:18:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 19:18:55 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18CPVv-0003eV-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:55 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18CPVq-0003e7-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:50 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18CPVm-0003dt-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:46 -0800
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:18:46 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Wiki summary of consensus about {ro}
Message-ID: <20021114191846.GI439@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <sdd3a59d.006@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <sdd3a59d.006@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2606
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:30:34PM +0000, And Rosta wrote:
> The big debate about "importing ro" moved from this list to Jboske,
> where is was eventually resolved. The consensus is given on the wiki
> (in a text that the debate's participants approved):
> 
> http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/quantification%20and%20the%20meaning%20of%20ro

Thank you very much for getting this written up!

In addition, I would like a comprehensive list of people who have agreed
to this, please. Such a list should probably go on the page itself.

I have placed some minor questions on the page.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ http://www.lojban.org/
la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a
darlu le'o -- RLP I'm a *male* Robin.




