From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Thu Nov 14 15:21:02 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Nov 2002 23:21:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 95958 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 23:21:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2002 23:21:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 23:21:02 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18CTID-000091-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:21:01 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18CTHA-00007P-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:19:56 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.112]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18CTH6-00006b-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:19:52 -0800 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-67-162.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.67.162]) by lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7685B68D for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:19:19 +0100 (MET) To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Wiki summary of consensus about {ro} Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:21:16 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20021114191846.GI439@digitalkingdom.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 2608 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Robin: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:30:34PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: > > The big debate about "importing ro" moved from this list to Jboske, > > where is was eventually resolved. The consensus is given on the wiki > > (in a text that the debate's participants approved): > > > > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/quantification%20and%20the%20mean > ing%20of%20ro > > Thank you very much for getting this written up! > > In addition, I would like a comprehensive list of people who have agreed > to this, please. Such a list should probably go on the page itself My answer that I've added to the page: "Robin asks who agreed with the above. Essentially, the answer is Everyone. Everyone in the online lojban community had the opportunity to participate, and everyone had the chance to dissent with the above text. The main participants in the closing stages of debate were Adam, And, John, Jordan, Nick, xod, xorxes. Of these, I think Adam, Jordan, Nick and xorxes were all positively in favour, xod explicitly said he didn't have a problem with it, and John consented by not voicing dissent." The page acknowledges at the top that pc wasn't party to the final consensus (which we know he wouldn't have liked). --And.