From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Nov 14 15:25:11 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Nov 2002 23:25:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 29016 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 23:25:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2002 23:25:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 23:25:11 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18CTMF-0000Ee-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:25:11 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18CTLd-0000Df-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:24:33 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18CTLZ-0000DR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:24:29 -0800 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:24:29 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Wiki summary of consensus about {ro} Message-ID: <20021114232429.GM439@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021114191846.GI439@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 2609 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:21:16PM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > Robin: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:30:34PM +0000, And Rosta wrote: > > > The big debate about "importing ro" moved from this list to Jboske, > > > where is was eventually resolved. The consensus is given on the wiki > > > (in a text that the debate's participants approved): > > > > > > > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/quantification%20and%20the%20mean > > ing%20of%20ro > > > > Thank you very much for getting this written up! > > > > In addition, I would like a comprehensive list of people who have agreed > > to this, please. Such a list should probably go on the page itself > > My answer that I've added to the page: > "Robin asks who agreed with the above. Essentially, the answer is > Everyone. Everyone in the online lojban community had the opportunity > to participate, and everyone had the chance to dissent with the above > text. The main participants in the closing stages of debate were Adam, > And, John, Jordan, Nick, xod, xorxes. Of these, I think Adam, Jordan, > Nick and xorxes were all positively in favour, xod explicitly said he > didn't have a problem with it, and John consented by not voicing > dissent." The page acknowledges at the top that pc wasn't party to the > final consensus (which we know he wouldn't have liked). I was sort of think that with a bulletted list, people could add their own names if they agree. But whatever. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ http://www.lojban.org/ la lojban. jai curmi roda .einai to ku'i so'ada mukti le nu co'a darlu le'o -- RLP I'm a *male* Robin.