From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Nov 18 20:12:23 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Nov 2002 04:12:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 54315 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2002 04:12:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Nov 2002 04:12:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Nov 2002 04:12:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18DzkK-0000uf-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:12:20 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18DzkG-0000uO-00; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:12:16 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Dzk7-0000th-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:12:07 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAJ4J3WF098254 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:19:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAJ4J23p098253 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:19:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:19:02 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Let's be friends Message-ID: <20021119041902.GA98029@allusion.net> References: <20021116225301.QCGE4359.tomts9-srv.bellnexxia.net@Savv> <20021116231947.GX17076@digitalkingdom.org> <3DD7720A.208@bilkent.edu.tr> <02111721181100.03071@neofelis> <3DD8C870.4020504@bilkent.edu.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DD8C870.4020504@bilkent.edu.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 2629 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:01:04PM +0200, robin wrote: > Pierre Abbat wrote: > >On Sunday 17 November 2002 05:40, Robin Turner wrote: > > > >>Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >> > >>>You've been virused. > >> > >>.u'i - and I thought it was a reference to the jboste controvery! > >> > >>mi snuge'i le nu mi na'e pilno la .uindoz. > > > > > >.i do mo la .uindoz? >=20 > OK, it was a slip - I should have used {na}. Though the possibilities=20 > are intriguing .... Why should you have used na? For example, do tesete djuno la .uindoz. zo'e do sanji la .uindoz. do tcidu loi mrilu noi se finti loi prenu noi pilno la .uindoz. Both na'e and na are correct here, they just make slightly different claims. OTOH, I don't have any idea what "snuge'i" means (I think this is what pierre was actually asking about). mu'o --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE92bu2DrrilS51AZ8RAmzGAJ4672rvwbURgx2mUo3VotCsdM+msgCdFCjP BMFavx8p+2IxgRQRKcCfl1s= =Edgs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--