From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Thu Nov 21 15:28:22 2002
Return-Path: <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 21 Nov 2002 23:28:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 20203 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2002 23:28:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 21 Nov 2002 23:28:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.112)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2002 23:28:21 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-68-176.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.68.176])
  by lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E295B689
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:28:20 +0100 (MET)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: mi nanca li (was: Re: Newbie says hi
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:30:21 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGELGGOAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <F458BYXifWoqFXfyY0Q000000e2@hotmail.com>
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

xorxes:
> la djorden cusku di'e
> 
> >Ok this is a load of crap. You guys are ignoring x3 of nanca;
> >there's nothing at all idiom-like or figurative about this usage 
> >
> >The elided zo'e could mean, for example:
> > mi nanca li paso zo'e
> > mi nanca li paso le kuspe be le te jbena kubi'o le cabna
> >
> >You guys are assuming it means le kuspe be le te jbena kubi'o lemu'e
> >mrobi'o 
> 
> I think the standard place was meant to distinguish Earth-years
> from other type of years, rather than for the dimension of x1
> to be measured 

Ah, that makes sense.

> In any case, I still think that by the same standard, one can
> nanca different numbers at different times 

Imagine we had truly spatial tenses, for saying things like
"such and such is true of such and such a segment of space".
How would you feel about me saying "I am 3 foot tall"?, conceiving
me as extending to a length of 3 feet in a certain segment of space
(the other 3 foot of me being in some other segment of space)?
Maybe it's just too weird to reason about coherently.

--And.

