From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Nov 25 03:56:44 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 25 Nov 2002 11:56:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 99382 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 11:56:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2002 11:56:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2002 11:56:43 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18GHr1-00069j-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 03:56:43 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18GHqx-00069S-00; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 03:56:39 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Nov 2002 03:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18GHqs-00069C-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 03:56:34 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0576B26FDE
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:55:54 +0200 (EET)
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (neo.fen.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.97.69])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F426D89
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:55:52 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <3DE20F4B.3060000@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:53:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Is .e == .ije?
References: <001901c294a7$68b5f640$0300a8c0@avitallap>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
X-archive-position: 2696
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: robin <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
From: robin <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

Avital Oliver wrote:
> Is <SUMTI1 e SUMTI2 cu SELBRI> always equivelant to <SUMTI1 cu SELBRI .ije
> SUMTI2 cu SELBRI>?
> 
> If so, then is <mi .e do mo> equivelant to <mi mo .ije do mo>?

My intuition tells me that they are not equivalent, since {mo} implies a 
selbri which can be slotted into that place. If we translate it into 
logicalese, it would be {(I AND you) do-what}, or "What predicate can 
take the arguments "I" and "you"?"
> 
> If so, how would I say, "What did we both do? (not neccisarily as a mass)"?

mi .e do mo

(as a mass, {mi joi do mo})

robin.tr

-- 
"You almost never hear that word "computer" anymore, do you?
They're part of everything now. They used to be boxes with
keyboards, you know." - Tad Williams

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Üniversitesi
Ankara
Turkey

http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin





