From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Mon Nov 25 07:51:32 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 25 Nov 2002 15:51:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 75091 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 15:51:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2002 15:51:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2002 15:51:31 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:17:35 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:51:58 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:51:42 +0000 To: olivera , lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Is .e == .ije? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin >>> Avital Oliver 11/25/02 10:35pm >>> #> You could say {mo mi e do}. In this case {mo} surely must #> have precedence, and it must expand to something like #> {mo mi ije go'i do}. # #Actually, it would be {mo fi mi e do}. Other than that I like your solutio= n. What would be {mo fi mi e do}? What's wrong with {mo mi e do} and {mo mi ije go'i do}? --And