Subject: [lojban] Re: Is .e == .ije?

From: Jordan DeLong <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:08:35 -0600

On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:53:47PM +0200, robin wrote:
> Avital Oliver wrote:
> >Is <SUMTI1 e SUMTI2 cu SELBRI> always equivelant to <SUMTI1 cu SELBRI .ije
> >SUMTI2 cu SELBRI>?
> >
> >If so, then is <mi .e do mo> equivelant to <mi mo .ije do mo>?
> 
> My intuition tells me that they are not equivalent, since {mo} implies a 
> selbri which can be slotted into that place. If we translate it into 
> logicalese, it would be {(I AND you) do-what}, or "What predicate can 
> take the arguments "I" and "you"?"
[...]

It's equivalent after the respondant provides a predicate, though.
(They have to provide the same predicate for both people (or at
least that's what they're being asked for)).

-- 
Jordan DeLong - [email-masked]
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku