From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Nov 28 10:04:11 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 28 Nov 2002 18:04:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 7318 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 18:04:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Nov 2002 18:04:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 18:04:11 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18HT1H-0008IR-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:04:11 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18HT1D-0008I9-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:04:07 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18HT18-0008Hx-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:04:02 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gASI9emW005198;
  Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:09:40 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gASI9cLn005192;
  Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:09:38 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:09:37 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com, Stefan 1of3 Koch <OneOfThree@gmx.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: How would you say "plural" and "singular"?
Message-ID: <20021128180937.GA5165@allusion.net>
References: <1038496425.514.38744.m12@yahoogroups.com> <001701c296dd$09ec11c0$0f9d07d5@oneof> <019c01c2973f$f02eadc0$0300a8c0@avitallap>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <019c01c2973f$f02eadc0$0300a8c0@avitallap>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-archive-position: 2733
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:40:14PM -0500, Avital Oliver wrote:
> From: Stefan "1of3" Koch=20
> mi cusku lu
>=20
> zoi gy dogs gy du la plural. pe zoi gy dog=20
>=20
> li'u
>=20
> .i ri na'epu'i cfipu=20
> But that's wrong. zoi gy dogs gy is not identical to anything called plur=
al. What might have worked is

It's not wrong: the pe happens inside the name. dogs is the same
as the thing called "plural of dog". You're thinking as if he
had said "zoi gy. dogs .gy. du la plural. ku pe zoi gy. dog .gy.".

Doesn't change that it's somewhat cheating though.

> zoi gy dogs gy me la plural ...

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE95lvgDrrilS51AZ8RAtKBAJ9Rm54avNncHsV/lPw+25xNbKLsMACfcTOs
lt9oZwk2LJET6vR0gThazP4=
=odIc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--