From phma@webjockey.net Thu Nov 28 12:43:08 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 28 Nov 2002 20:43:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 85760 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 20:43:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Nov 2002 20:43:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 20:43:07 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id D09C63C6C4; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:43:05 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:42:59 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021127163350.036c0b80@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021128140213.031df040@pop.east.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20021128140213.031df040@pop.east.cox.net> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02112815425908.02982@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Thursday 28 November 2002 14:08, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > All three of these are changes to the baseline, not clarifications, and are > not part of the cmavo definition effort. I doubt that they will get much > consideration therefore; usages by a single person are not sufficient to > decide an issue. There will be a procedure for making such proposals, > however. The procedures will be determined by Nick and the byfy. When were rafsi fu'ivla made part of the baseline? They are listed in the refgram as an experimental proposal. Can you point me to the criteria that make {srutio}, {letcue}, and (I remembered the other one) {damskrima} invalid? As far as I can tell from the specification in the refgram, they are valid. phma