From ragnarok@pobox.com Fri Nov 29 16:13:34 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 30 Nov 2002 00:13:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 30907 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 00:13:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Nov 2002 00:13:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 00:13:33 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A2AC5CC20024; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:13:32 -0500 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 19:13:43 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.67] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >> But the policy is not open to amendment at this point >For this very reason, I will vote against it, even though I agree with >the great majority of it. I agree. I also feel that the votes so far should be visible to the voters - nothing is gained or lost, and I want to know how people who haven't written in yet feel. Information wants to be free.