From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Nov 29 17:26:36 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 30 Nov 2002 01:26:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 91804 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 01:26:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Nov 2002 01:26:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao02.cox.net) (68.1.17.243) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 01:26:35 -0000 Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20021130012633.XIYI2203.lakemtao02.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org> for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:26:33 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129201628.031287f0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 20:18:56 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [llg-members] Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy In-Reply-To: <0211291341530J.02982@neofelis> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021129125713.00abb680@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021129015947.03165ec0@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021129125713.00abb680@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: Robert LeChevalier X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab At 01:41 PM 11/29/02 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: >On Friday 29 November 2002 13:01, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > > At 08:20 AM 11/29/02 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > >I don't use the TLI alternate orthography, so when I write {srutio}, I > > > don't mean {sruti'o}. > > > > But if srutio is a valid word, then it has to be usable by those who DO you > > the alternate orthography. > > > > >But there is a word which jbofi'e accepts and which has one > > >of those diphthongs: {ckankua}. If this is in fact invalid, then jbofi'e > > > has a bug. > > > > 1. jbofi'e is not an official LLG standard. > > 2. ckankua fails the slinku'i test > >what about {cipnrxakuila}? I dunno? What about it? If someone has said it is invalid, what was their reason? I don't pretend to be more a master of fu'ivla than others. So far as I know, however, the rafsi fu'ivla like that one all work. lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org