From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Dec 01 15:41:09 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 1 Dec 2002 23:41:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 2501 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2002 23:41:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Dec 2002 23:41:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2002 23:41:08 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AE139277005A; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 18:41:07 -0500 To: Subject: A question on the new baseline policy Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 18:41:25 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.67] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl Under the new baseline policy, would it be possible to have such common "errors" as ka'enai incorporated into the official language?