From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Dec 01 19:54:00 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 03:54:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 6015 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 03:54:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 03:54:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 03:54:00 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Iheh-0001Qx-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:53:59 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ihec-0001Qg-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:53:54 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18IheU-0001QX-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:53:46 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB23xYG9032874 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:59:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB23xYCL032873 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:59:34 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 21:59:34 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy) Message-ID: <20021202035934.GA32846@allusion.net> References: <20021202025037.GB31478@allusion.net> <20021202033616.GA32484@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021202033616.GA32484@allusion.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 2859 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 09:36:16PM -0600, Jordan DeLong wrote: [...] > I don't think ka'enai has anything to do with logic. Neither is > it inconsistent with the rest of tense cmavo. Why aren't you > complaining that you can't say "za'onai"? [...] s/za'o/ze'u/ --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE96tqmDrrilS51AZ8RAlAqAJ9ELSHM8HtNEZg482bXaODX/EHARQCgx6eL nmcC3EFgVN6RoDHW4DS6N3o= =6/Zv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--