From jcowan@reutershealth.com Sun Dec 01 21:56:45 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 05:56:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 10476 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 05:56:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 05:56:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 05:56:44 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18IjZU-00021H-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 21:56:44 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18IjZO-000210-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 21:56:38 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 01 Dec 2002 21:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [65.246.141.151] (helo=mail2.reutershealth.com)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18IjZH-00020p-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 21:56:31 -0800
Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21])
  by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA16419;
  Mon, 2 Dec 2002 01:08:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200212020608.BAA16419@mail2.reutershealth.com>
Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:53:14 -0500
Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan
To: fracture@allusion.net
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:53:14 -0500 (EST)
Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20021202023225.GA31478@allusion.net> from "Jordan DeLong" at Dec 01, 2002 08:32:25 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 2865
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Reply-To: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456
X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan

Jordan DeLong scripsit:

> Why is a specific toggle cmavo for loglan (which has difficulties
> in terms of parsing mentioned) any better than fu'ivla? {me zoi
> loglan. fooo foo foo .loglan. brodo brodo}, etc, works fine. It's
> what we use for accessing words from other languages. 

Actually that won't work: it means "x1 is an instance of the words
'fooo foo foo', not their referents.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
"Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram
that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
as any, even sans digital signature." --me




