From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Dec 01 22:02:08 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 06:02:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 56101 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 06:02:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 06:02:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 06:02:07 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18Ijeh-00027S-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:02:07 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18Ijea-00022X-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:02:00 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18IjeT-00022K-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:01:53 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB267fG9034735;
  Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:07:41 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB267fp4034734;
  Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:07:41 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:07:40 -0600
To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan
Message-ID: <20021202060740.GA34660@allusion.net>
References: <20021202023225.GA31478@allusion.net> <200212020608.BAA16419@mail2.reutershealth.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200212020608.BAA16419@mail2.reutershealth.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 2866
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:53:14AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Jordan DeLong scripsit:
> > Why is a specific toggle cmavo for loglan (which has difficulties
> > in terms of parsing mentioned) any better than fu'ivla? {me zoi
> > loglan. fooo foo foo .loglan. brodo brodo}, etc, works fine. It's
> > what we use for accessing words from other languages.=20
>=20
> Actually that won't work: it means "x1 is an instance of the words
> 'fooo foo foo', not their referents.

s/zoi/la'o/

You get the idea...

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE96visDrrilS51AZ8RAvlqAKCvXOty0d6fXGulZ9FHgAID2+WnuQCgmBcX
bAfG0Hv/SrsUi/v1i5H/DFY=
=Z8Q1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--

