From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon Dec 02 06:53:13 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 14:53:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 53753 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 14:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 14:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 14:53:12 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Irwe-0004wm-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:53:12 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18IrwQ-0004vT-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:52:59 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18IrwE-0004sK-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:52:46 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB2EqGt57485 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:52:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:52:16 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021202094939.S57466-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2877 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > Anyway, if the conservatives won, I wonder how > many "ka'enai" users would stop using it. Not many, I suspect. > Maybe Nick, depending on his mood on a given day. So you're likely > to end up with a baseline that is followed only in those aspects > that command intrinsic respect. A very interesting and worthy point. If the BF's decisions will be ignored by significant fractions of users, why should it bother making them? This is a case of the leaders seeing where the people are going, running out in front of them, and then claiming to lead them. Anyway, I await someone to describe the difference between na'eka'e and to'eka'e. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.