From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon Dec 02 06:54:44 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 14:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 36203 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 14:54:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 14:54:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 14:54:42 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Iry6-00054F-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:54:42 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Iry0-00053Y-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:54:36 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Irxo-00050R-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 06:54:24 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB2Ers957513 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:53:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:53:54 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Progress In-Reply-To: <009001c29a03$3b659e50$3202a8c0@mauve> Message-ID: <20021202095253.V57466-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2878 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, David Barton wrote: > In the midst of controversy, I can't help but share a little buzz: the > first time my "under control" list is bigger than the "New Word" list on > Logflash. Little things mean a lot. Yes, I'm trying again to do this. > Perhaps I'll start contributing to the Lojban discussion this time. > (After the gismus, I get to tackle the cmavos, which are *much* harder > for me). Congratulations! I look forward to seeing your contributions. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.