From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon Dec 02 10:51:19 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 18:51:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 76748 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 18:51:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 18:51:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 18:51:18 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Ivf4-0000UO-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:51:18 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Iver-0000U1-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:51:05 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:51:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ivem-0000Ts-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 10:51:01 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB2IoSF58849 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:50:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:50:28 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan In-Reply-To: <41EE5F3E-05D2-11D7-BAFA-000393629ED4@uic.edu> Message-ID: <20021202134526.P58622-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2890 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Steven Belknap wrote: > Poaching? What a horrible analogy! These are intelligent people who > were interested enough in Loglan to learn some of the language. They > are not dumb game animals. Loglan is dead. Maybe they would be > interested in learning the successor language. Maybe we can do some > things to facilitate that transition, or at least to make old > Loglanders feel welcome. Produce one of these creatures and let us determine if it's an animal or human. Right now they seem rather like lo'e pavseljirna. What color is the typical single-horned Loglanist? > How "stable" was it to throw the complete vocabulary in the trash? The LLG didn't do that. Loglan was as viable as it ever was after the LLG started Lojban. Stop holding Lojbab responsible for the impending death of the TLI. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.