From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 02 19:45:19 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 3 Dec 2002 03:45:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 92371 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 03:45:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Dec 2002 03:45:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 03:45:19 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18J3zr-00054g-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:45:19 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18J3zk-00054O-00; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:45:12 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:45:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18J3za-00054E-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:45:08 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB33omG9045876
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:50:49 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB33okV7045869
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:50:46 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:50:46 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
Message-ID: <20021203035046.GA45692@allusion.net>
References: <20021202210937.GJ1520@digitalkingdom.org> <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEENHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEENHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 2944
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:28:25AM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> Robin:
[...]
> > Ranting on about how the whole community should have been consulted fro=
m
> > the get-go is just silly=20
>=20
> Apparently so, since nobody else seems to think they should have been
> consulted. I'm quite surprised, though. I'd have thought that the
> view would be more prevalent that Lojban belongs to the general
> membership and that a 'cabal' benignly second-guessing the membership
> is still failing to adequately recognize that fact. That's what I
> would have thought, but I stand corrected.

Just thought I'd weigh in that I strongly support the board for
coming up with a decent, written proposal before consulting the
community at large. I don't think there'd be any chance of getting
anything done without that, as what was being asked of the community
would be ambiguous. I believe the members of the board sufficiently
reflect (or are at least able to consider) the various opinions of
the larger community to be able to come up with a reasonable proposal
which most everyone can live with.

Also, I think they are quite right to ask for a mandate from the
community (or at least the members (which I'm not, btw)) rather
than just acting (which they are perfectly entitled to do).

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE97CoVDrrilS51AZ8RApqQAKCwx7vcesOEEpnMevFBsblOMVKJNACfaFKM
C+nKC3eiYtAca9SOWK2o7Mg=
=yskZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--

