From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Dec 04 07:36:27 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 4 Dec 2002 15:36:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 84009 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 15:36:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Dec 2002 15:36:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 15:36:26 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:02:13 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:36:59 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:36:19 +0000 To: opoudjis , lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Baseline statement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Nick, I am cool with everything you say. (Did I manage to sound like Robin in that last sentence?) I greatly appreciate your message. On this point: # D. Good thing you don't feel strongly about abolishing unintelligible=20 # cmavo. I do: I regard it as an intolerable baseline breaking. cmavo can=20 # only be nuked with overwhelming support, and I'd say when external=20 # factors make them nukable.=20 I subsequently changed my mind, & the default position I'll be taking for them is to leave them for Usage to Decide. We don't need to discuss this further until BF is underway, but I thought I'd pipe up to reassure you I am longer suggesting the murder of innocent virgin cmavo. --And.