From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Dec 04 07:56:13 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 4 Dec 2002 15:56:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 32584 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 15:56:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Dec 2002 15:56:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 15:56:07 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Jbsd-0002zx-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:56:07 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JbsX-0002zg-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:56:01 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JbsS-0002zX-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:55:56 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB4G1uG9062406 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:01:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB4G1pfE062405 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:01:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:01:51 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Baseline statement Message-ID: <20021204160151.GA61962@allusion.net> References: <957ADF0C-078E-11D7-9FC7-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <957ADF0C-078E-11D7-9FC7-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 3007 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:45:00AM +1100, Nick Nicholas wrote: [...] > 9. Jordan's ma'ei This was actually Adam's suggestion. > Hm. If mu'ei is adopted, I would want it readily expanded to different=20 > logics, but I don't want a different cmavo for each one. Maybe ma'ai=20 > mi'ei mu'ei, mu'ai xi vo, with the modality of each stated=20 > metalinguistically (we already can use metalinguistic tags to=20 > disambiguate mex operators.) >=20 > But that's getting ahead of myself... How would the modality be stated metalinguistically? Can you give an example? (Or could just wait till the BPFK addresses it). --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE97ibvDrrilS51AZ8RAkIVAJ9uUXf+4M+KV94VZAz1WoUCkmDrrACfbQZ5 0WJT9hz5tuoKFrU4ddgmCaw= =v67h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--