From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Dec 04 10:33:36 2002
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 4 Dec 2002 18:33:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 79424 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 18:33:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Dec 2002 18:33:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 18:33:35 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Wed, 4 Dec 2002 17:59:41 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:34:34 +0000
Message-Id: <sdee4aba.057@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:33:57 +0000
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Baseline statement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

Jorge:
#So, to repeat what my vote would be: YES to Nick and the byfy,
#NO to the policy as a whole.

Me too.=20

I wouldn't ordinarily post a me-too: I'm doing it because several people
(rather harshly, IMO) interpreted my earlier responses as wrecking.

--And.