From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Dec 04 16:06:04 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 19220 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18JjWm-0006Cu-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:06:04 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JjWh-0006Ca-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:05:59 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:05:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JjWc-0006CM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:05:54 -0800 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.67] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A841834024E; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 19:05:21 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:05:33 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.67] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-archive-position: 3023 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: raganok@intrex.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: raganok@intrex.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out >>> McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him? >> >> Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited, >> as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the >> least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a >> Loglanist. > I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read >all the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so. I must say, I am extremely dissappointed. Not that anyone chooses not to be on the bypyfyk, but that we have driven away a person who has expressed some interest in the language.