From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Dec 04 16:09:06 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 00:09:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 20499 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 00:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 00:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 00:09:06 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18JjZi-0006E5-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:09:06 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JjZf-0006Do-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:09:03 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:09:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18JjZa-0006Dd-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:08:58 -0800 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:08:58 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Message-ID: <20021205000858.GK22111@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3024 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:05:33PM -0500, Craig wrote: > >>> McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him? > >> > >> Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited, > >> as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the > >> least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a > >> Loglanist. > > >I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read all > >the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so. > > I must say, I am extremely dissappointed. Not that anyone chooses not > to be on the bypyfyk, but that we have driven away a person who has > expressed some interest in the language. He's explicitely declared that he has no interest in learning the vocabulary of lojban. What definition of 'interest in the language' are you using? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi