From phma@webjockey.net Wed Dec 04 19:19:33 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 03:19:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 6540 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 03:19:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 03:19:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 03:19:32 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 346993C48C; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:19:30 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] cmegadri valfendi preti Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:19:28 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <02120414202304.01986@neofelis> In-Reply-To: <02120414202304.01986@neofelis> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02120422192809.01986@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Wednesday 04 December 2002 14:20, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Another question: why is the cmegadri broken off from what precedes it, > instead of just breaking between the cmene and the cmegadri and leaving the > cmegadri to be found later? What about {MUstelaVIson} and {muSTElaVIson}? > How should they be analyzed? More weasel words: {MUstela.Albipes} and {muSTEla.Albipes}. (I made that up. There is a nigripes.) The weasel cage at Bertcad Mivdal has five locks. It seems that with any fewer, the weasels are clever enough to open them. phma